The opportunity
A traffic spike can come from real demand, a campaign, referral spam, server-side events, duplicate tags, monitoring tools, internal users, or automated sessions. Filtering before checking commerce impact can hide a real event; treating every session as a customer can distort decisions.
BizSidekick compares the anomaly with a normal baseline, profiles the affected traffic, checks event and order consistency, and separates verified facts from likely causes.
How it works
- Define the anomaly window — Confirm the metric, start and end, comparison baseline, time zone, known releases, campaigns, and business events.
- Profile the traffic change — Compare source, medium, campaign, geography, device, browser, landing page, hostname, engagement, and session timing.
- Inspect event behavior — Check duplicate events, impossible sequences, event-to-session ratios, missing identifiers, consent behavior, and tag changes.
- Verify commerce impact — Compare add-to-cart, checkout, purchase events, Shopify orders, net sales, refunds, and inventory activity.
- Classify likely causes — Separate real demand, known campaign traffic, tracking defects, internal traffic, monitoring, referral spam, and probable automation.
- Build filtering and monitoring guidance — Return evidence, business impact, proposed data filters, validation steps, owners, and recurrence alerts.
Safety boundary
The diagnosis does not delete analytics data or apply a permanent filter. Probable automation remains a hypothesis until supported by multiple behavioral signals and checked against real orders.
Expected outcome
An anomaly diagnosis with affected traffic, business impact, evidence, filters, and monitoring rules
Try this prompt
Paste it into ChatGPT to start this use case.
@BizSidekick Diagnose this GA4 traffic anomaly. Compare source, geography, device, landing page, events, engagement, conversion, Shopify orders, and known campaign changes, then separate likely bots, tracking defects, and real demand.
